John S. Knight of The Akron Beacon Journal

By Robert H. Giles
The Nieman Foundation


In 1967, John S. Knight was 73 years old and still writing The Editors Notebook, a Sunday column he had started in 1930 at the Akron Beacon Journal, which now reached a national audience.

The notebook was where JSK spoke his mind with blunt honesty, often to the discomfort of his social peers at the country clubs and business peers in the boardrooms. Writing the notebook was a ritual we observed every Thursday at the Beacon Journal. At precisely 9 a.m., Knight would stride purposely through the newsroom, dressed like a banker, jaw set for action. He entered his office in the corner of the newsroom and closed the door. There were no interruptions, except at noon when his secretary, Lillian Brenner, would deliver a hot dog from a sandwich shop across the street, kept warm in a silver service. At 3 p.m. the door would open and Jack would emerge, copy in hand, ready for discussion and editing.

John S. Knight
In 1967, public sentiment was building against the war in Vietnam. But by then, Jack Knight had been warning against U.S. involvement in Indochina since 1954. By early 1967, he saw the war as a quagmire and wrote with passionate indignation, "Either our government has no well-defined policy or stands guilty of lying to the people or both."

In August, Knight was one of 23 Americans appointment by President Johnson to observe the national elections in South Vietnam. He was the lone opponent of the war in the group. If LBJ thought the experience would soften his criticism, it did just the opposite. Gene Patterson of the Atlanta Journal and Constitution initially thought Knight was just a dove. "But I was wrong," he said later. "He was a journalist, always probing for fresh information and new insights."

"Although the right of dissent is clearly set forth in our Bill of Rights, there are those who would deny this right to others who view U.S. involvement in Vietnam as a grim and unending tragedy."
Knight recorded extensively during his Vietnam trip. And what he saw and heard merely deepened his skepticism. "The American people," he wrote, "can't understand why the lives of our young men are being sacrificed to keep unscrupulous South Vietnamese politicians in power. We are paying a tragic price for what may prove to be an unattainable goal."

Back home, he denounced the rise of anti-intellectualism as a corrosive side effect of the war. "Although the right of dissent is clearly set forth in our Bill of Rights," he wrote, "there are those who would deny this right to others who view U.S. involvement in Vietnam as a grim and unending tragedy."

Knight's vigorous defense of free speech angered the powerful pro-war factions that wanted to smother dissent. And they could not understand how this editor, a man of elegant taste and old-fashioned virtue, could take the side of rebellious youths who smoked pot and wore the American flag on their tattered jeans. To his critics, he replied, "As an opponent of our involvement in Vietnam since 1954, I have neither enjoyed criticizing three presidents nor accurately predicting the consequences of their policies." When the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing was awarded to Jack Knight the following May, the Pulitzer Board noted the clearness of style, moral purpose, sound reasoning and power to influence public opinion.

For this plain spoken Ohio editor, by then a national figure as chairman of Knight Newspapers, the prize was an affirmation of the virtue of speaking one's mind with clarity and honesty.

← PREVIOUS: Arthur O. Sulzberger | NEXT: Al Neuharth

This was a "leadership moment" presented at the ASNE Convention April 3, 2001, at the J.W. Marriott Hotel in Washington, D.C.